The concept of "care" has been fraught with negative connotations within the disability movement; the concepts of empowerment, choice and control have been developed as alternatives. The peer-support movement in the mental health sector draws from this tradition, and is uncomfortable with the provision of care. Drawing on the feminist ethic of care, we will argue in this paper that "care"--in the sense of caring about, rather than caring for--should be seen as fundamental within peer support. The practice of peer support evidences a kind of "care" that does involve some interdependence, and taking of "responsibility". The challenge is to make this a "responsibility towards", rather than a "responsibility for". If this is successfully achieved, care can indeed become acknowledged as part of "standard peer support", and the basis for the development of autonomy and self-determination. (Contains 8 notes.)