NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
50 Years of ERIC
50 Years of ERIC
The Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) is celebrating its 50th Birthday! First opened on May 15th, 1964 ERIC continues the long tradition of ongoing innovation and enhancement.

Learn more about the history of ERIC here. PDF icon

Showing 1 to 15 of 438 results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Margolis, Melissa J.; Clauser, Brian E. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2014
This research evaluated the impact of a common modification to Angoff standard-setting exercises: the provision of examinee performance data. Data from 18 independent standard-setting panels across three different medical licensing examinations were examined to investigate whether and how the provision of performance information impacted judgments…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring), Data, Licensing Examinations (Professions)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Clauser, Jerome C.; Margolis, Melissa J.; Clauser, Brian E. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2014
Evidence of stable standard setting results over panels or occasions is an important part of the validity argument for an established cut score. Unfortunately, due to the high cost of convening multiple panels of content experts, standards often are based on the recommendation from a single panel of judges. This approach implicitly assumes that…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Generalizability Theory, Replication (Evaluation), Cutting Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Clauser, Jerome C.; Clauser, Brian E.; Hambleton, Ronald K. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2014
The purpose of the present study was to extend past work with the Angoff method for setting standards by examining judgments at the judge level rather than the panel level. The focus was on investigating the relationship between observed Angoff standard setting judgments and empirical conditional probabilities. This relationship has been used as a…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Validity, Reliability, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Humphry, Stephen; Heldsinger, Sandra; Andrich, David – Applied Measurement in Education, 2014
One of the best-known methods for setting a benchmark standard on a test is that of Angoff and its modifications. When scored dichotomously, judges estimate the probability that a benchmark student has of answering each item correctly. As in most methods of standard setting, it is assumed implicitly that the unit of the latent scale of the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Standard Setting (Scoring), Judges, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wyse, Adam E.; Bunch, Michael B.; Deville, Craig; Viger, Steven G. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2014
This article describes a novel variation of the Body of Work method that uses construct maps to overcome problems of transparency, rater inconsistency, and scores gaps commonly occurring with the Body of Work method. The Body of Work method with construct maps was implemented to set cut-scores for two separate K-12 assessment programs in a large…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wyse, Adam E. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
Construct maps are tools that display how the underlying achievement construct upon which one is trying to set cut-scores is related to other information used in the process of standard setting. This article reviews what construct maps are, uses construct maps to provide a conceptual framework to view commonly used standard-setting procedures (the…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Cutting Scores, Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kingston, Neal M.; Tiemann, Gail C.; Loughran, Jessica T. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
The authors of this article comment on "Construct Maps as a Foundation for Standard Setting," by Adam E. Wyse (this issue) in which Wyse presents construct maps, a visual display of a variety of sources of evidence that support standard-setting decisions, and shows how this approach could be used with a variety of existing…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Methods, Misconceptions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McClarty, Katie Larsen – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
The construct map is a promising tool for organizing the data standard-setting panelists interpret. The challenge in applying construct maps to standard-setting procedures will be the judicious selection of data to include within this organizing framework. Therefore, this commentary focuses on decisions about what to include in the construct map.…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Validity, Evidence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Popham, W. James – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
The author recalls that as a child, he grooved on teeter-totters. Also known as a seesaw, a teeter-totter is a long, narrow board that's elevated with a pivot point in the middle so that as one end goes down the other end goes up. When going up or going down, sometimes quite rapidly, teeter-totters can provide their two riders with some…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Performance, Standards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Skaggs, Gary – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
The construct map is a particularly good way to approach instrument development, and this author states that he was delighted to read Adam Wyse's thoughts about how to use construct maps for standard setting. For a number of popular standard-setting methods, Wyse shows how typical feedback to panelists fits within a construct map framework.…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Test Construction, Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kane, Michael T.; Tannenbaum, Richard J. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
The authors observe in this commentary that construct maps can help standard-setting panels to make realistic and internally consistent recommendations for performance-level descriptions (PLDs) and cut-scores, but the benefits may not be realized if policymakers do not fully understand the rationale for the recommendations provided by the…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Cutting Scores, Policy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bunch, Michael B. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
In this issue of "Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives," Adam E. Wyse provides a thorough review of research to date on the use of construct maps in standard setting. He juxtaposes concepts and methods in ways that make their connections to one another clearer and more obvious than they might otherwise have been. In…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Validity, Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Davis-Becker, Susan – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
In his article "Construct Maps for Standard Setting," Adam E. Wyse provides a detailed review on the current use of construct maps in standard setting, including how they may be operationalized within a variety of standard-setting methods. The premise of the argument is that construct maps can serve as a useful tool for conducting a…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Sample Size, Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schulz, E. Matthew – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
In this article, E. Matthew Schulz responds to Adam Wyse's article, "Construct Maps as a Foundation for Standard Setting." In doing so, he asserts that one of the most important ideas in Wyse's work is that information used in standard setting needs to be better represented through the use of graphics. However, he's not…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Item Response Theory, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mee, Janet; Clauser, Brian E.; Margolis, Melissa J. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2013
Despite being widely used and frequently studied, the Angoff standard setting procedure has received little attention with respect to an integral part of the process: how judges incorporate examinee performance data in the decision-making process. Without performance data, subject matter experts have considerable difficulty accurately making the…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Judges, Data, Decision Making
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  30