NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
ERIC Number: EJ499790
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 1995
Pages: N/A
Abstractor: N/A
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0164-0259
EISSN: N/A
Commentary: On Influential Books and Journal Articles Initially Rejected because of Negative Referees' Evaluations.
Campanario, Juan Miguel
Science Communication, v16 n3 p304-25 Mar 1995
Describes examples of influential and/or highly cited papers that were initially rejected by one or more scientific journals. The case studies suggest that, although rejection may result in an improved manuscript, on other occasions referees may simply have failed to appreciate a paper's importance. (82 references) (Author/AEF)
Descriptors: Bibliographies, Books, Case Studies, Manuscripts, Peer Evaluation, Periodicals, Publishing Industry, Research Reports, Revision (Written Composition), Scientific Research, Tables (Data), Writing for Publication
Publication Type: Opinion Papers; Reports - Research; Journal Articles
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A