NotesFAQContact Us
Search Tips
Call for Feedback: Proposed Changes to How ERIC Indicates Peer Review
Call for Feedback

ERIC proposes to expand the peer-reviewed indicator to additional materials. ยป Learn more

Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
ERIC Number: EJ499790
Record Type: CIJE
Publication Date: 1995
Pages: N/A
Abstractor: N/A
Reference Count: 0
ISSN: ISSN-0164-0259
Commentary: On Influential Books and Journal Articles Initially Rejected because of Negative Referees' Evaluations.
Campanario, Juan Miguel
Science Communication, v16 n3 p304-25 Mar 1995
Describes examples of influential and/or highly cited papers that were initially rejected by one or more scientific journals. The case studies suggest that, although rejection may result in an improved manuscript, on other occasions referees may simply have failed to appreciate a paper's importance. (82 references) (Author/AEF)
Publication Type: Opinion Papers; Reports - Research; Journal Articles
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers: Nobel Prizes; Referees; Science (Journal); Science Writing