NotesFAQContact Us
Search Tips
Call for Feedback: Proposed Changes to How ERIC Indicates Peer Review
Call for Feedback

ERIC proposes to expand the peer-reviewed indicator to additional materials. ยป Learn more

Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
ERIC Number: EJ222669
Record Type: CIJE
Publication Date: 1980-Mar
Pages: N/A
Abstractor: N/A
Reference Count: 0
Whose Is the Fallacy? A Rejoinder to Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky.
Cohen, L. Jonathan
Cognition, v8 n1 p89-92 Mar 1980
Kahneman and Tversky's critique of Cohen's position on adults' probability reasoning is not valid. If they think Baconian logic is normatively unsound, the onus is on them to explain why. It is valid and useful because nature itself is full of causal processes. (Author/RD)
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Opinion Papers
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers: N/A